# Falcon-180B vs GPT-5.4 Pro

> GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-gpt-5-4-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.4 Pro in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.4 Pro leads 71.0 to 18.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 58.8 |
| Rank | 254 | 16 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $30 |
| Output $/M | — | $180 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- GPT-5.4 Pro: 42.6 (#89)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | — | 57.4% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- GPT-5.4 Pro: 71.0 (#10)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 159.12 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleBench | — | 74.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 94.5% |
| CritPt | — | 30% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 58.6% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 23.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- GPT-5.4 Pro: 72.0 (#17)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 82.5% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 58.5% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 50% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 37.5% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- GPT-5.4 Pro: 68.3 (#6)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94.6% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 44.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 46.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 8.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- GPT-5.4 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- GPT-5.4 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- GPT-5.4 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GPT-5.4 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than GPT-5.4 Pro?

GPT-5.4 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 58.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GPT-5.4 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.4 Pro has 16.