# Falcon-180B vs GLM-5V-Turbo

> GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-glm-5v-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5V-Turbo in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-5V-Turbo leads 62.5 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 43.8 |
| Rank | 260 | 84 |
| Context | — | 200K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 42.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1466 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 29.7 (#89)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1443 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 39.4 (#106)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1441 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1452 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Falcon-180B: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 40.9 (#42)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1264 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1416 |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 53.0 (#73)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1488 |
| LMArena French | — | 1444 |
| LMArena German | — | 1423 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1431 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1450 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 75.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1423 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 44.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1438 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- GLM-5V-Turbo: 62.5 (#73)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-5V-Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1416 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1432 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than GLM-5V-Turbo?

GLM-5V-Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GLM-5V-Turbo share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5V-Turbo has 19.