# Falcon-180B vs GLM-4.5-Air

> GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-glm-4-5-air
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-4.5-Air in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where GLM-4.5-Air leads 56.1 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 38.7 |
| Rank | 254 | 169 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.10 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- GLM-4.5-Air: 34.5 (#225)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| GSO | — | 2.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1397 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 23.3 (#166)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1379 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 43% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.2 |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- GLM-4.5-Air: 33.8 (#166)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 39.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1396 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- GLM-4.5-Air: 34.6 (#184)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 76.2% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 9.3% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 59.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1370 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 49.4 (#130)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1366 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1427 |
| LMArena French | — | 1399 |
| LMArena German | — | 1376 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1348 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1373 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1385 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 69.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1353 |
| IFEval | — | 81.2% |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- GLM-4.5-Air: 41.6 (#130)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1367 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- GLM-4.5-Air: 56.1 (#134)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | GLM-4.5-Air |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1384 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1343 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1371 |
| WildBench | — | 78.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than GLM-4.5-Air?

GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.7 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and GLM-4.5-Air share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and GLM-4.5-Air has 27.