# Falcon-180B vs Gemma 3 27B

> Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-gemma-3-27b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 3 27B in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 27B leads 52.7 to 29.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 30.5 |
| Rank | 254 | 277 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.08 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 4.9% |
| SciCode | — | 21.2% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 39.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1322 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 29.5% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1340 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | 130.04 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 40.4% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 43.8% |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 51.5% |
| LMCA | — | 12.3% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 50% |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 22.5% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1312 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 74% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 47.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 40.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1303 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1165 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1334 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena French | — | 1368 |
| LMArena German | — | 1362 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1348 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1321 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 74.9% |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 33.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1333 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 3 27B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1358 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1346 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1344 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 79.9% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1266 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 34.6% |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Gemma 3 27B?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemma 3 27B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 27B has 43.