# Falcon-180B vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

> Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 4 categories and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 0 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Falcon-180B leads 29.3 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Google |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 28.8 |
| Rank | 254 | 313 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1034 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 23.3% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1005 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1047 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 970 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1011 |
| LMArena German | — | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 990 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 992 |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1003 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 958 |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Falcon-180B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.8 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.
