# Falcon-180B vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 52.7 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Google |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 260 | 173 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | 135.06 |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | — |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.