# Falcon-180B vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

> Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/falcon-180b-vs-gemini-2-0-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite leads 51.7 to 29.1.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Google |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 37.8 |
| Rank | 260 | 194 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.9 (#185)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | — | 47.1% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1322 |

## Reasoning

- Falcon-180B: 19.1 (#269)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 22.0 (#210)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1324 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 50.1% |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 112.13 | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 54.3% |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |

## Math

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.4% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.1% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1309 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 35.0 (#189)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1305 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.2 (#109)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1100 |

## Multilingual

- Falcon-180B: 25.2 (#286)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.0 (#161)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1323 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1339 |
| LMArena French | — | 1347 |
| LMArena German | — | 1306 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1301 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1328 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1313 |

## Instruction Following

- Falcon-180B: 53.4 (#286)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.4 (#163)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1305 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 78.3% |
| IFEval | — | 82.4% |

## Long Context

- Falcon-180B: —
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#160)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1320 |

## Writing & Preference

- Falcon-180B: 29.1 (#295)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.7 (#177)

| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1330 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1319 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1307 |
| WildBench | — | 79% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 34.3% |

## FAQ

### Is Falcon-180B better than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.8 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32.