# ERNIE 5.1 vs Ring-2.6-1T

> ERNIE 5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#87); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 25.3 to 20.9.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 87 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Ring-2.6-1T?

ERNIE 5.1 has enough public results to be ranked (#87); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.