# ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen3 8B

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 43.4 to 33.4.
- Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 33.3 |
| Rank | 87 | 237 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 136.17 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)
- Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen3 8B?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 33.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3 8B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.