# ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Plus

> Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-qwen3-7-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 39.3 to 21.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1 and 74.8% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 45.3 |
| Rank | 83 | 72 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1473 |
| FrontierCode | — | 10.2% |
| SciCode | — | 45.5% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 2.8% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | 74.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1460 |
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 24% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 84% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 147.37 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1466 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 34.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1467 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1279 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1445 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1510 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1471 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1413 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1415 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1457 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1440 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1455 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
- Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1439 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1460 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.