# ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Max

> Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-qwen3-7-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3.7 Max in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Max leads 49.2 to 21.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1 and 85.1% for Qwen3.7 Max.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 51.5 |
| Rank | 83 | 42 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $7.50 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 50.4 (#45)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1498 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 77.3% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1515 |
| SciCode | — | 48.8% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,189 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Max: 22.1 (#135)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 49.2 (#38)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | 85.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1483 |
| SimpleBench | — | 70.4% |
| CritPt | — | 13.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 19% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 9.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 32% |
| DTBench | — | 92.3% |
| LMCA | — | 44% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 153.68 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 62.4 (#32)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1490 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 64.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 34.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 61.6 (#28)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1488 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 55.8% |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 56.9 (#15)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1530 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1484 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 76.7 (#38)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1460 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#40)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
- Qwen3.7 Max: 65.0 (#54)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1476 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1449 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1481 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1110 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 51.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen3.7 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.4 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Max share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.