# ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen3.7 Flash

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-qwen3-7-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 41.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1 and 43.8% for Qwen3.7 Flash.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 83 | 156 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.03 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.13 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
- Qwen3.7 Flash: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.