# ERNIE 5.1 vs Qwen Max

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 40.3 to 22.3.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 34.7 |
| Rank | 83 | 230 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
- Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
- Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1269 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
- Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
- Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1142 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
- Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1288 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
- Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Qwen Max?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Qwen Max better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Qwen Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.