# ERNIE 5.1 vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 44.0 to 36.1.
- MiMo-V2-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 83 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- MiMo-V2-Flash: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1420 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 41.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 36.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.