# ERNIE 5.1 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

> MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-mimo-v2-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 2 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Flash in 6 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads 36.5 to 21.9.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 48.5 |
| Rank | 83 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 53.4 (#30)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1504 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1637 |
| SciCode | — | 51.3% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 36.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1482 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 12% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 51.9 (#52)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1468 |
| ProofBench | — | 63% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 42.2 (#99)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1501 |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 40.5 (#47)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 54.0 (#51)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1511 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1475 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1456 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 76.8 (#35)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1463 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 44.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 63.1 (#67)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1455 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1400 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 48.5 to 43.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or MiMo-V2.6-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.4 versus 44.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and MiMo-V2.6-Flash share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 19.