# ERNIE 5.1 vs Kimi K2.7 Code

> ERNIE 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-kimi-k2-7-code
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Kimi K2.7 Code leads 39.0 to 21.9.
- Kimi K2.7 Code has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Moonshot AI |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 43.3 |
| Rank | 83 | 94 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.95 |
| Output $/M | — | $4 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 42.9 (#95)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 30.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 30.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1473 |
| SciCode | — | 47.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 54.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 886.23 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 24.0 (#122)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 37.6% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.9% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,083 |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 39.0 (#61)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 57.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 10% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 48.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 149.97 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 52.9 (#48)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 54% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 12.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: 53.5 (#57)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87.9% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 36.5% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
- Kimi K2.7 Code: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Kimi K2.7 Code |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Kimi K2.7 Code?

ERNIE 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.8 vs 43.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Kimi K2.7 Code better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 42.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Kimi K2.7 Code share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.7 Code has 19.