# ERNIE 5.1 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-gpt-5-2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.8 to 20.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 23.4% for ERNIE 5.1 and 79.3% for GPT-5.2 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 52.2 |
| Rank | 87 | 34 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $21 |
| Output $/M | — | $168 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.41 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than GPT-5.2 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.2 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and GPT-5.2 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.