# ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemma 7B

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.1 to 27.1.
- Gemma 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 83 | 299 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | — | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | — | 43.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Gemma 7B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1042 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.99 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 79% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1066 |
| GSM8K | — | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | 1001 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1488 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1017 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 963 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Gemma 7B?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 7B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemma 7B share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.