# ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemma 3n E4b IT

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-gemma-3n-e4b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 3n E4b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 50.3.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 87 | 203 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 36.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1269 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.2 (#239)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1284 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 31.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 32.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1251 |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 33.6 (#193)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1245 |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.5 (#179)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1310 |
| LMArena French | 1486 | 1330 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1312 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1274 |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1288 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.3 (#205)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1255 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1277 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)
- Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.3 (#181)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3n E4b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1306 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1287 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1276 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Gemma 3n E4b IT?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 3n E4b IT better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemma 3n E4b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18.