# ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemma 3 12B

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-gemma-3-12b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 3 12B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 47.7.
- Gemma 3 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 87 | 255 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)
- Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1281 |
| SciCode | — | 17.4% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 30.4% |
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)
- Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1309 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 48.8% |
| LMCA | — | 4.5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 123.49 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)
- Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1307 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.7% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)
- Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 39.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.4% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Gemma 3 12B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | — | 46.7% |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)
- Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1318 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1370 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1335 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)
- Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1299 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)
- Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1317 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)
- Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemma 3 12B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1334 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1331 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1334 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1126 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Gemma 3 12B?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemma 3 12B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemma 3 12B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 3 12B has 24.