# ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

> Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-gemini-2-5-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 5 categories and Gemini 2.5 Pro in 3 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in long context, where Gemini 2.5 Pro leads 59.7 to 44.7.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 44.9 |
| Rank | 87 | 67 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 42.8 (#86)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1452 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.6% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 53.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 83.1% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1227 |
| SciCode | — | 42.8% |
| GSO | — | 3.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 54% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 85.9% |
| CadEval | — | 64% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.52 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.51 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 29.1 (#81)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | 1142 |
| Terminal-Bench | — | 32.6% |
| GDPval | — | 23.3% |
| Remote Labor Index | — | 0.8% |
| TheAgentCompany | — | 30.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 13.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 42.8% |
| BALROG | — | 43.3% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 55.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 573.64 |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 28.8 (#85)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1455 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 4.9% |
| SimpleBench | — | 62.4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 70.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 41% |
| CritPt | — | 2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 5.6% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 89.8% |
| DTBench | — | 82.4% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 79.9% |
| LMCA | — | 34.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.32 |
| ForecastBench | — | 61.3 |
| LiveBench | — | 82.3% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 31.9 (#191)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 24.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.7% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 41.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 90.2% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 95.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 14.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 4.2% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.8 (#41)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1452 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 85.3% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 21.6% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 86.3% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.6% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 74.9% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 44.5 (#16)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| GeoBench | — | 86% |
| VPCT | — | 48% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1421 |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 44.7% |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 55.5 (#30)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1452 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1507 |
| LMArena French | 1486 | 1473 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1462 |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | 1435 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1460 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1473 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 75.2 (#71)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1436 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 80.6% |
| IFEval | — | 84% |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 59.7 (#5)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1449 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 91.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)
- Gemini 2.5 Pro: 63.9 (#60)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.5 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1458 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1453 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1453 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 83.8% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1421 |
| WildBench | — | 85.7% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 67.8% |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Gemini 2.5 Pro?

Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.9 to 43.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 2.5 Pro better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (43.4 vs 42.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 2.5 Pro share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.5 Pro has 78.