# ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 44.7 to 29.2.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.8 | 39.1 |
| Rank | 83 | 173 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.0 (#76)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.8 (#187)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 21.9 (#211)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 22.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 40.3 (#92)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 39.7 (#100)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.9 (#102)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#167)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1492 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.5 (#29)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1508 | — |
| LMArena French | 1488 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.7 (#37)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.5 (#59)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#59)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.2 (#292)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.1 (#52)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#165)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1441 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 39.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.