# ERNIE 5.1 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-gemini-2-0-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 7 categories and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 51.9.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 37.3 |
| Rank | 87 | 189 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 37.4 (#181)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | 1322 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 47.1% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 21.2 (#203)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1324 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 50.1% |
| DTBench | — | 52.5% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 65.5% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |
| LiveBench | — | 54.3% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 31.8 (#192)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | 1309 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 37.4% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.1% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 34.6 (#185)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | 1305 |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 72% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 50% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 30.6 (#103)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1100 |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 46.2 (#156)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1323 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | 1339 |
| LMArena French | 1486 | 1346 |
| LMArena German | 1470 | 1306 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | 1302 |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | 1325 |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | 1328 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | 1313 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 70.6 (#158)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1305 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 78.3% |
| IFEval | — | 82.4% |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 40.1 (#155)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | 1321 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)
- Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite: 51.9 (#172)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1330 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1319 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1307 |
| WildBench | — | 79% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 34.3% |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.1 or Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite better for coding?

ERNIE 5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.4 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Flash-Lite has 32.