# ERNIE 5.1 vs Falcon-180B

> ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-1-vs-falcon-180b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.1 scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.1 leads 65.3 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 87 | 254 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.1: 43.4 (#78)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1488 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.1: —
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | 1227 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.1: 20.9 (#209)
- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1481 | 1007 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 23.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.89 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |
| WinoGrande | — | 87.1% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.1: 37.5 (#96)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1481 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 54.4% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.1: 41.2 (#103)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1491 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 67.8% |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.1: 55.7 (#28)
- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1455 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1507 | — |
| LMArena French | 1486 | — |
| LMArena German | 1470 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1422 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1459 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1472 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.1: 76.9 (#35)
- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1460 | 1047 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.1: 44.7 (#56)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1462 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.1: 65.3 (#50)
- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.1 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1468 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1440 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1471 | 1013 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.1 better than Falcon-180B?

ERNIE 5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.1 and Falcon-180B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.1 has 19 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.