# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Trinity Large Thinking

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-trinity-large-thinking
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 54.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 16.5% for Trinity Large Thinking.
- Trinity Large Thinking has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 129 | 180 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 33.8 (#238)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 16.3 (#298)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | 16.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | 41.6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1350 |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 34.9 (#149)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1366 |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 40.3 (#107)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1359 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- Trinity Large Thinking: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 46.4 (#155)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1372 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1312 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1304 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1338 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1356 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 70.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1334 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 41.2 (#139)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1355 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- Trinity Large Thinking: 54.0 (#152)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1321 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1342 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Trinity Large Thinking?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Trinity Large Thinking share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.