# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Ring-2.6-1T

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#129); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Ring-2.6-1T leads 26.1 to 17.0.
- Ring-2.6-1T has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 36.9 |
| Rank | 129 | — |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.7

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 432.57 |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 26.1

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Ring-2.6-1T?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 has enough public results to be ranked (#129); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 40.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Ring-2.6-1T share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.