# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen3 14B

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-qwen3-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 43.0 to 37.3.
- Qwen3 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 35.5 |
| Rank | 129 | 225 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.35 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
- Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: —
- Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
- Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 49.1% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
- Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
- Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
- Qwen3 14B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen3 14B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen3 14B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 37.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen3 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.