# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-qwen2-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 49.5.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 129 | 179 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 37.9 (#171)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1314 |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 24.8 (#139)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1299 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 33.5 (#175)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1298 |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 34.9 (#179)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1289 |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 42.1 (#196)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#180)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1292 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.5 (#186)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1299 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 37.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.