# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen2.5-Coder-32B

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-qwen2-5-coder-32b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 41.8.
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 32.9 |
| Rank | 129 | 239 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.66 |
| Output $/M | — | $1 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.4 (#328)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1276 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 9% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 16.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 49% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 56.9% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 87.2% |
| MBPP+ | — | 77% |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 20.4 (#220)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1251 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 42.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 49.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 119.41 |
| HellaSwag | — | 83% |
| LiveBench | — | 46.2% |
| WinoGrande | — | 80.8% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 30.8 (#203)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1251 |
| LiveBench Math | — | 46.6% |
| GSM8K | — | 93% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 32.9 (#200)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1221 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 70.5% |
| MMLU | — | 79.1% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#230)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1205 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1222 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1228 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1223 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 58.7% |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1251 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.8 (#235)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1230 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1174 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1222 |
| LiveBench Language | — | 23.3% |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen2.5-Coder-32B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 32.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 22.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31.