# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-qwen2-5-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.3 to 16.2.
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 30.1 |
| Rank | 129 | 297 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.80 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
- Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 38.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.