# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen1.5-72B

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-qwen1-5-72b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.8 to 11.5.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 30.8 |
| Rank | 129 | 285 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 31.9 (#277)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1165 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 22.2 (#203)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1148 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#205)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1164 |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#300)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1136 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
- Qwen1.5-72B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 33.2 (#253)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1159 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1050 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1110 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 59.3 (#256)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1141 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 35.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
- Qwen1.5-72B: 37.3 (#258)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen1.5-72B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen1.5-72B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.