# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen Plus

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 36.5 to 22.0.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 129 | 204 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- Qwen Plus: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen Plus?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen Plus better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.