# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Qwen Max

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-qwen-max
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Max in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 36.5 to 21.0.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 34.4 |
| Rank | 129 | 226 |
| Context | — | 33K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.60 |
| Output $/M | — | $6.40 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#288)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1288 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 21.8% |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- Qwen Max: 24.1 (#154)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1270 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- Qwen Max: 21.0 (#272)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1275 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 16.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 67.2% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- Qwen Max: 30.3 (#222)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- Qwen Max: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- Qwen Max: 42.0 (#197)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1263 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1254 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1329 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1254 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1205 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1274 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1290 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- Qwen Max: 66.7 (#203)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1262 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- Qwen Max: 39.4 (#175)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1289 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- Qwen Max: 48.0 (#200)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Qwen Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1282 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1277 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Qwen Max?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 34.4 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Qwen Max better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Qwen Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Max has 23.