# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs phi-3-medium 14B

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in knowledge, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 39.2 to 9.1.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 129 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | — |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than phi-3-medium 14B?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and phi-3-medium 14B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.