# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Olmo 3 32b Think

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-olmo-3-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 14

## Summary

- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 49.2.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 38.1 |
| Rank | 129 | 182 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1318 |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1302 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1315 |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1272 |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1300 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1291 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1255 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1275 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1296 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1289 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.