# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-olmo-3-1-32b-think
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 15

## Summary

- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 7 categories and Olmo 3.1 32b Think in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.1 to 46.2.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 37.9 |
| Rank | 129 | 191 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1291 |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | 1272 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1305 |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | 1295 |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1242 |
| LMArena French | 1467 | 1260 |
| LMArena German | 1460 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1289 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1247 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1272 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1226 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | 1252 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 37.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Olmo 3.1 32b Think better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.0 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.