# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

> MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-mimo-v2-6-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 30.4 to 16.3.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 46.7 |
| Rank | 129 | 55 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.43 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.87 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 53.2 (#27)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1538 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1618 |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 30.4 (#76)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1511 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.9 (#91)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1497 |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.0 (#85)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1548 |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.2 (#40)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | 1265 |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 57.0 (#15)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1474 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1532 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1481 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#10)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1490 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#26)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1500 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.9 (#32)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1491 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1465 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1463 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.7 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.2 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 14.