# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Mercury 2

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-mercury-2
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 6 categories and Mercury 2 in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 63.4 to 54.0.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Inception |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 129 | 167 |
| Context | — | 128K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.75 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- Mercury 2: 33.2 (#250)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1391 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1170 |
| SciCode | — | 38.7% |
| WeirdML | — | 43.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 785.58 |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- Mercury 2: 23.0 (#170)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1362 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0.8% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- Mercury 2: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- Mercury 2: 35.6 (#170)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1358 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.3% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- Mercury 2: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- Mercury 2: 46.8 (#153)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1331 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1303 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- Mercury 2: 70.4 (#161)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1328 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- Mercury 2: 40.4 (#149)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1329 |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- Mercury 2: 54.0 (#151)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Mercury 2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1355 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1289 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1358 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Mercury 2?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Mercury 2 better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 33.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Mercury 2 share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Mercury 2 has 17.