# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Grok 4

> Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-grok-4
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 3 categories and Grok 4 in 6 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4 leads 36.9 to 16.3.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 47.8 |
| Rank | 129 | 49 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- Grok 4: 49.9 (#44)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1408 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 79.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 45.7% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: —
- Grok 4: 32.1 (#62)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 63% |
| GDPval | — | 21.1% |
| Cybench | — | 43% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.3% |
| BALROG | — | 43.6% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1142 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 66.6% |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- Grok 4: 36.9 (#59)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1409 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 16% |
| SimpleBench | — | 60.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 73.6% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 66.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 28% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.46 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.9 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- Grok 4: 46.5 (#58)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1422 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 60.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 19.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- Grok 4: 53.7 (#50)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1417 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 87% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 85.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 12.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 72.7% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- Grok 4: 33.1 (#89)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | 1211 |
| GeoBench | — | 45% |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- Grok 4: 52.0 (#98)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1403 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1428 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1418 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1429 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1396 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1376 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1409 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1419 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- Grok 4: 79.4 (#4)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1387 |
| IFEval | — | 94.9% |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- Grok 4: 63.1 (#4)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1409 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- Grok 4: 58.7 (#111)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Grok 4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1412 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1397 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1416 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 76.9% |
| WildBench | — | 79.7% |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Grok 4?

Grok 4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Grok 4 better for coding?

Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 49.9 versus 42.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Grok 4 share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 has 48.