# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

> GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-gpt-5-2-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 0 categories and GPT-5.2 Pro in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.2 Pro leads 51.5 to 17.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 79.3% for GPT-5.2 Pro.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 52.3 |
| Rank | 129 | 39 |
| Context | — | 400K |
| Input $/M | — | $21 |
| Output $/M | — | $168 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.0 (#94)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 17.0 (#297)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.5 (#33)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | 79.3% |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 54.2% |
| SimpleBench | — | 57.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 90.5% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1445 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 155.4 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.3 (#110)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: 65.3 (#29)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 31.3% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.8 (#128)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1428 | — |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.9 (#53)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1249 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.1 (#49)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1467 | — |
| LMArena German | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1382 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.5 (#92)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#95)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.1 (#66)
- GPT-5.2 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | GPT-5.2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1434 | — |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than GPT-5.2 Pro?

GPT-5.2 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 52.3 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and GPT-5.2 Pro share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.2 Pro has 8.