# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

> Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-gemini-3-1-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 20

## Summary

- They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview leads 71.7 to 16.3.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is NYT Connections (extended): 10.3% for ERNIE 5.0 0110 and 97.4% for Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Google |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 56.7 |
| Rank | 129 | 20 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 42.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | 1483 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 75.6% |
| DeepSWE | — | 11.7% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1446 |
| SciCode | — | 58.9% |
| GSO | — | 22.6% |
| WeirdML | — | 72.1% |
| MirrorCode | — | 8.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,161 |
| AlgoTune | — | 2.02 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: —
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 37.7 (#33)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 80.2% |
| APEX-Agents | — | 35.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 26% |
| DeepResearch Bench | — | 47.8% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 22% |
| BALROG | — | 57% |
| ExploitBench | — | 26.1% |
| GBAEval | — | 0.8% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1211 |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 77% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,774 |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.7 (#9)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | 97.4% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | 79.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | 1484 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 77.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 79.6% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 98% |
| CritPt | — | 17.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 55% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 36.8% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 14.3% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| DTBench | — | 97.1% |
| LMCA | — | 53.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 154.92 |
| ForecastBench | — | 59 |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 61.8 (#28)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1437 | 1485 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 59.6% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 26.8% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 86.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 95.6% |
| ProofBench | — | 26% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 36.9% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 16.7% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 71.8 (#3)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | 1484 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94.4% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 46.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 73.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.4% |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 38.1 (#60)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | 1296 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 26.5% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 26.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1444 |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 57.1 (#11)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | 1475 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | 1528 |
| LMArena French | 1466 | 1488 |
| LMArena German | 1462 | 1491 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | 1494 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1458 |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | 1496 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | 1480 |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 77.1 (#31)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1465 |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 47.3 (#17)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | 1482 |
| CL-bench | — | 20.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 16.9% |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview: 66.3 (#36)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | 1480 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | 1482 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | 1486 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1491 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1142 |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview?

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.7 to 41.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.3 vs 42.7); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview has 71.