# ERNIE 5.0 0110 vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/ernie-5-0-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in long context, where ERNIE 5.0 0110 leads 43.4 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Baidu | Google |
| Noometry Index | 41.2 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 129 | 171 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |

## Coding

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 42.3 (#94)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1455 | — |

## Reasoning

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 16.3 (#296)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 10.3% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| Thematic Generalization | 41.7% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1446 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 135.06 |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |

## Math

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 36.5 (#111)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1437 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 83.5% |

## Knowledge

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.2 (#125)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1427 | — |

## Multimodal

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 39.1 (#49)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1248 | — |

## Multilingual

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 54.3 (#47)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1436 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1512 | — |
| LMArena French | 1466 | — |
| LMArena German | 1462 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1383 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1446 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1473 | — |

## Instruction Following

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 74.7 (#88)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | — |

## Long Context

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 43.4 (#90)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1422 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- ERNIE 5.0 0110: 63.4 (#64)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | ERNIE 5.0 0110 | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1445 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1426 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1433 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 38.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is ERNIE 5.0 0110 or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

ERNIE 5.0 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.3 versus 37.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do ERNIE 5.0 0110 and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. ERNIE 5.0 0110 has 20 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.