# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Qwen3.6 Plus

> Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-qwen3-6-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 62.2 to 15.2.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 47.5 |
| Rank | 342 | 62 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | — | $3 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.8 (#130)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1467 |
| SWE-bench Verified | — | 57.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1461 |
| SciCode | — | 40.7% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 670.15 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 5,115 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 29.3 (#93)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1449 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 147.65 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.3% |
| CritPt | — | 2.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 17% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 59.5% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 12% |
| DTBench | — | 81.9% |
| LMCA | — | 33.1% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 51.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1450 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 38.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 26.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 8.3% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#45)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 44.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1454 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.3 (#70)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1424 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1477 |
| LMArena French | — | 1455 |
| LMArena German | — | 1452 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1379 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1434 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1432 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1425 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.2 (#49)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 20.3% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1439 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.2 (#82)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.6 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1437 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1404 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1438 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.