# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Qwen3.5 Plus

> Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-qwen3-5-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Plus in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 49.6 to 27.3.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 42.9 |
| Rank | 342 | 106 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.40 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 146.78 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 871 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | — |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- Qwen3.5 Plus: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Qwen3.5 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen3.5 Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.