# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.4 to 15.3.
- Dolly 2.0-12b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 36.7 |
| Rank | 339 | 204 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327)
- Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315)
- Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250)
- Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291)
- Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299)
- Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1325 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306)
- Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Qwen Plus share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.