# Dolly 2.0-12b vs phi-3-medium 14B

> phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 6

## Summary

- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 2 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 36.3 to 23.0.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 339 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 776 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | 81.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | 91.6% |
| MMLU | 26.2% | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | 87.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than phi-3-medium 14B?

phi-3-medium 14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and phi-3-medium 14B share?

6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.