# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct

> Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-olmo-2-0325-32b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.1 to 15.2.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 32.7 |
| Rank | 342 | 254 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1210 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1208 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1208 |
| Omni-MATH | — | 16.1% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 41.4% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 28.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1160 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1187 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1186 |
| IFEval | — | 78% |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1194 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1218 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1199 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1221 |
| WildBench | — | 73.4% |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better for coding?

Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16.