# Dolly 2.0-12b vs MiniMax-M2.7

> MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-minimax-m2-7
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.7 in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.7 leads 58.9 to 15.2.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 37.7 |
| Rank | 342 | 196 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 41.8 (#120)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1454 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1398 |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 37% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 599.25 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.1 (#111)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 45.1% |
| ExploitBench | — | 13.3% |
| GBAEval | — | 0% |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 19.7 (#253)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1422 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 145.85 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 24.7% |
| CritPt | — | 0.6% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 39.3% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 25.9 (#263)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1420 |
| ProofBench | — | 3% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 37.7 (#152)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 12.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1444 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 50.3 (#123)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1382 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1441 |
| LMArena French | — | 1421 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1403 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 74.1 (#103)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1405 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- MiniMax-M2.7: 43.3 (#99)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1419 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- MiniMax-M2.7: 58.9 (#112)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiniMax-M2.7 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1405 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1354 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1412 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than MiniMax-M2.7?

MiniMax-M2.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.7 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or MiniMax-M2.7 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.8 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and MiniMax-M2.7 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.7 has 30.