# Dolly 2.0-12b vs MiMo-V2.5

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.8 to 15.3.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 43.0 |
| Rank | 339 | 89 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.0 (#327)
- MiMo-V2.5: 43.6 (#75)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 14.6 (#315)
- MiMo-V2.5: 27.8 (#98)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.94 | — |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 25.0 (#250)
- MiMo-V2.5: 35.4 (#145)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 40.2 (#109)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1459 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multimodal

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 39.0 (#53)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1245 |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#291)
- MiMo-V2.5: 52.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1467 |
| LMArena French | — | 1447 |
| LMArena German | — | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1412 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.9 (#299)
- MiMo-V2.5: 75.7 (#55)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1433 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 44.1 (#69)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1444 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#306)
- MiMo-V2.5: 61.8 (#82)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1427 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 23.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and MiMo-V2.5 share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.