# Dolly 2.0-12b vs Inkling

> Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/dolly-2-0-12b-vs-inkling
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Dolly 2.0-12b scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Inkling leads 65.2 to 15.2.

## Snapshot

| | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Databricks | Thinking Machines Lab |
| Noometry Index | 25.5 | 44.1 |
| Rank | 342 | 80 |
| Context | — | 66K |
| Input $/M | — | $1.87 |
| Output $/M | — | $4.68 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 23.4 (#332)
- Inkling: 34.5 (#234)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 776 | 1464 |
| FrontierCode | — | 14% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1413 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 4.1% |
| SciCode | — | 47% |
| WeirdML | — | 32.3% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 946 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Inkling: 29.6 (#85)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 33.8% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 25% |

## Reasoning

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.3 (#316)
- Inkling: 40.4 (#56)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 804 | 1451 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.67 | 148.54 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 36.5% |
| SimpleBench | — | 50% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 79.5% |
| CritPt | — | 5.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 21% |
| DTBench | — | 87.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| HellaSwag | 70.8% | — |
| PIQA | 75.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 61.8% | — |

## Math

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 27.3 (#251)
- Inkling: 31.3 (#225)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 871 | 1479 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 33.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 4.9% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 88.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Inkling: 55.1 (#49)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 88.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 40.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1465 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 39.6% | — |
| BoolQ | 56.3% | — |
| MMLU | 26.2% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 39.2% | — |

## Multilingual

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 17.4 (#296)
- Inkling: 54.0 (#52)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 836 | 1434 |
| LMArena Chinese | 836 | 1490 |
| LMArena French | — | 1458 |
| LMArena German | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1404 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1448 |

## Instruction Following

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 38.7 (#304)
- Inkling: 75.1 (#71)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 814 | 1426 |

## Long Context

- Dolly 2.0-12b: —
- Inkling: 43.8 (#86)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1434 |

## Writing & Preference

- Dolly 2.0-12b: 15.2 (#311)
- Inkling: 65.2 (#51)

| Benchmark | Dolly 2.0-12b | Inkling |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 851 | 1441 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 864 | 1387 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 740 | 1436 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1611 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1226 |

## FAQ

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b better than Inkling?

Inkling is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.1 to 25.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Dolly 2.0-12b or Inkling better for coding?

Inkling scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.5 versus 23.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Dolly 2.0-12b and Inkling share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Dolly 2.0-12b has 17 scored results on Noometry and Inkling has 41.